At the recent Retroviruses conference (Chicago,
Jan. 31 - Feb. 4), a research team from Glaxo Wellcome presented
two posters proposing possible mechanisms for the lipid (fat)
abnormalities which appear to be associated with use of protease
inhibitors in some patients--together with supporting
biochemical data from laboratory studies.1,2 Other mechanisms
have been proposed, but without such laboratory data.
Unfortunately the posters had limited impact at the conference,
because this research is based on lipid biochemistry which is
unfamiliar to most AIDS experts. We have met with the
researchers and received additional documentation to help us
explain this work to a larger audience.
Part of the difficulty in research on
lipodystrophy is that pharmaceutical companies have
disincentives to highlight problems with their products. Glaxo
has different incentives, because it has not marketed a protease
inhibitor yet--and the lipid research suggest that its protease
inhibitor amprenavir (Agenerase(tm), which was originally
developed by Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. and formerly known as
VX478 or 141W94), may not have the same problem. Also, according
to Glaxo, there has been almost no lipodystrophy in its
expanded-access program which so far has given the drug to over
1500 patients. But no one knows if these laboratory results will
predict what happens in people; and the expanded-access program
has not given amprenavir to enough people for long enough to
know with confidence that they will not have as much
lipodystrophy as those treated with other drugs, since this
problem is most likely to occur after long-term use. While these
results are interesting, only time will tell whether this drug
will be associated with less lipodystrophy than other HIV
protease inhibitors in human use.
Mechanisms
No one knows for sure what is causing symptoms such as "Crix
belly" or "buffalo hump" and associated loss of
fat in the face, arms, and legs--and metabolic complications
which are often associated, including high triglycerides and
cholesterol, and development of insulin resistance or even
diabetes in some patients. Most experts today believe that
protease inhibitors are probably involved, even though there
were a few such cases before these drugs were used.
Many researchers believe that the fundamental
problem in this syndrome is the loss of subcutaneous fat, rather
than its abnormal accumulation. The loss of equilibrium between
fat deposited in the body and lipids in the bloodstream may lead
to very high blood levels of LDL cholesterol (the "bad
cholesterol") and triglycerides. For unknown reasons, this
excessive fat in the bloodstream can be deposited in certain
parts of the body, causing abnormal fatty growth there--and also
increasing the long-term risk of cardiovascular disease. In
addition, the loss of fat due to certain illnesses is associated
with a predisposition to insulin resistance--the relative
ineffectiveness of insulin in the body, which can lead to
diabetes if it becomes severe enough.
The Glaxo Wellcome researchers who did these
studies had much previous experience in measuring lipid changes,
through studies of other conditions including diabetes and
obesity. They applied tests they were already familiar with to
look for effects of HIV protease inhibitors on fat cells in the
laboratory. Their work suggests that not all lipodystrophy is
the same, but that there are at least two distinct mechanisms
involved, depending on which protease inhibitor is used. (In
both cases the tests were done with animal cells--a reminder
that this work is still a theory of lipodystrophy, not a proven
cause.)
One Possible Mechanism:
Preventing Development of Fat Cells
In one experiment,1 fat cells were grown in the laboratory, with
or without HIV protease inhibitors. In this test, saquinavir,
ritonavir, and nelfinavir greatly reduced the development of fat
cells from stem cells; however, neither indinavir nor amprenavir
had much effect. Saquinavir, ritonavir, and nelfinavir also
increased the metabolic destruction of fat in existing fat
cells.
Another Mechanism:
Increasing Retinoid Toxicity
Retinoids are compounds related to vitamin A; some of them are
found naturally in the body, where they have many different
effects. Too much of certain retinoids causes toxic effects due
to abnormal biochemical signaling in the body, and the toxicity
of excessive vitamin A can resemble some of those sometimes seen
in the lipodystrophy syndrome.
The same animal cells used above were also
tested in this experiment.2 But here, instead of measuring the
fat cells produced in a laboratory culture, the researchers used
a certain gene in these cells, which is sensitive to retinoid
signaling and also produces a product which is easy to measure
in the laboratory. The protease inhibitors alone did not affect
the activity of the gene.
When protease inhibitors were combined with
retinoids the results were complex, depending on the protease
inhibitor and the retinoid. But perhaps the most important
single result is that indinavir (alone among all the protease
inhibitors in human use) clearly stimulated signaling by
all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA). ATRA is a retinoid produced
naturally in the body from vitamin A. While it is too early to
know that these laboratory studies apply to humans, the
researchers suggest that indinavir may cause some lipodystrophy
problems by changing retinoid signaling--in effect, causing
retinoid toxicity not by increasing the amount of ATRA present,
but by increasing the body's sensitivity to it.
If this theory is correct (and
no one knows yet), it would suggest that vitamin A
supplementation might be harmful if one is taking indinavir, by
making some of the lipodystrophy problems more likely to occur.
Possibly this theory could be tested by looking for correlations
between lipodystrophy and vitamin A intake in clinical
databases--if there are databases which have enough patients
taking indinavir, keep consistent records on lipodystrophy, and
record nutritional intake.
This theory is related to the
one published by Carr and others last summer,3
but there are biochemical differences.
Cases of lipodystrophy have been reported among people taking
any of the currently licensed protease inhibitors. In some studies
the development of the signs of lipodystrophy during protease
inhibitor therapy was as high as 64%.
The results of an Australian trial of combination therapy with
ritonavir and saquinavir showed, 30% of participants had developed
lipodystrophy after 48 weeks treatment, 68% had elevated
cholesterol, and 85% had elevated triglycerides.
Many HIV patients being treated with protease inhibitors
experience increases in blood cholesterol and triglycerides. It is
yet unknown if these increases are related to lipodystrophy or are
an entirely separate side-effect, nor is it known what the longer
term implications may be. Since high levels of blood cholesterol
and triglycerides maintained over long periods may contribute to
heart disease.
In a Canadian trial of ritonavir/saquinavir, 11% of patients
saw triglyceride levels increase three- to four-fold during
treatment. A number of these patients were treated with drugs
designed to reduce the levels of lipids in the blood. Gemfibrozil
(Lopid) and clofibrate significantly reduced these lipid levels by
more than 50% in four out of six cases.
Some physicians conclude that while lipodystrophy is
cosmetically undesirable and may cause significant psychological
distress, it remains to be seen whether it is a symptom of a
serious underlying condition.